What type
of lean event should we do first, Value Stream Mapping (VSM) or Kaizen Burst?
Before we
can answer this question, let’s first define these two popular event types
Value Stream Mapping (VSM) – A multiple day
event (2-5 days) focused on mapping the process from customer order to customer
delivery. The goal is to complete a current state and future state map, then identify the 8 forms of waste that is keeping the process from achieving the future state.
Requires multi-disciplined participation from all stakeholders who impact, or
are impacted by the process. The deliverable is a list of projects, actions and
events that need to be completed in the next 6-12 months, with names and due
dates.
Kaizen Burst – Also called rapid process
improvement (RPI). A 3-5 day event focused on making dramatic improvements to a specific part of a process by the end of the event (focus is on implementation, not planning). Not
every action will be completed, but the goal is to have 80% of the actions
completed during the event, and the remaining 20% completed within 30 days of
the end of the event. The event should allow time to make adjustments in case the changes do not work. The goal is to make quick progress without pushing the waste to another department or area.
If you’re
just getting started with your process improvement in a process area or
department, I would highly recommend the kaizen burst event. The goal is to scope
the intent and purpose of the event, then do a considerable amount of work up
front (usually takes 1-2 weeks of preparation). During the event, the first
couple days are focused on getting everyone familiar with the preparation, and to
go and physically observe the current process, so everyone is aware of the wastes and
issues. The rest of the days are focused on implementation. It’s an action-driven
event. When you get done with the event, you have something to show for all
that work and time away from your regular job.
Typical Kaizen Burst Workshop format, from Lean Enterprise Institute |
When you
pull people away from their job for 3 to 5 days, and you are just starting with
process improvement (Lean and Six Sigma), you want to have something to show
for all that time.
One of the
problems with VSM events is that they end with a list of actions items. Now in
order to see results from the event, you are asking those same people to spend
more time after the event to complete these tasks. Remember, they have already taken
time out of their work week. They are already behind with their regular work,
and will need time to catch up. Even though there is excitement after the
event, it’s not enough to carry into the following week. It requires a lot of
micro-managing and project management and “hounding” people. In addition, usually
only a handful of people get assigned tasks, and it is usually quite a few actions.
Don’t get
me wrong, I think VSM events are excellent, and great for getting multiple
departments and groups to understand the entire process, and get on the same
page. However, it is really just a good planning activity, and the event alone
does not result in any immediate improvement (other than networking and
knowledge of the value stream). In fact, it can takes months before the actions
results in any improvement.
Example of Value Stream Map |
But for
those getting started, or those that are needing major improvements, I would
highly recommend the kaizen burst event.
Both events
require upfront planning, but the kaizen burst requires more than the VSM,
since there may be major improvements taking place in a short amount of time.
Getting the right people involved is essential to success. That is why the
kaizen burst event needs leadership authorization to empower the team at the
start. In order to make these improvements, they must be allowed to try it out
without a lengthy approval process. Leaders must assign and delegate people to the team they
trust, or provide guidelines and rules that the team must stay within (such as
budget, procedures, etc).
Finally, a
kaizen burst usually involves the people doing the value-added work, more often
than VSM events, which seem to be too heavy on management. You want to engage those people as much as possible early on in a Lean Six Sigma journey,
since they are the ones who need to understand the concepts, and see the
immediate results applied to their work.
After the
process area has matured, or a couple kaizen bursts have been performed, then a
VSM event might be needed, when their primary problems are coming from outside
their area (outside their control). The idea is to “clean up your own
backyard” before you bring outsiders into the process.
In summary,
if the process area does not have a mature lean system (poor visuals, employees
not trained in lean, hard to see process flow, lots of inventory, poor labels,
lots of waste), then kaizen burst is the place to start.
What do you think? Do you agree? Share your comments below...